✓
Authentic
First analyzed May 11, 2026, 12:51 AM
· authenticity score 90/100
#617
AI confidence
90%
Risk level: low
Findings
- The image exhibits natural lighting and shadows consistent with an outdoor environment.
- The textures of the dog's fur, the concrete, and the surrounding vegetation appear natural and unmanipulated.
- There are no visible signs of AI-generated artifacts such as merged fingers, garbled text, or impossible geometry.
- The dog's features, including its eyes and teeth, appear natural and not 'too perfect'.
- The human leg and foot show natural skin texture and imperfections, not plastic-like smoothness.
- The composition is natural and not overly polished, suggesting an authentic photograph.
Recommendation
This image is classified as an unmodified original photograph.
Content hash (SHA-256)
a62f03214eac7ab564b1bc6b240944cf01c565cbf3ce642d7bdb31f5ee398b1a
This looks real. Our analysis found no signs of manipulation (90/100 authenticity).
This is an independent check — not legal proof, but a useful second opinion. Anyone can re-run it: same file in,
same answer out.
·