✕
Deepfake detected
First analyzed Jun 14, 2026, 6:14 PM
· authenticity score 30/100
#634
AI confidence
90%
Risk level: high
Post-processing
Detected
multiple
Findings
- The birds exhibit an unnaturally uniform and fluffy texture, lacking the subtle variations typically seen in natural bird feathers.
- The composition is highly stylized and 'too perfect', with three identical-looking birds perfectly spaced on a branch, which is a common characteristic of AI-generated or heavily composited images.
- The lighting on the birds appears very soft and even, almost studio-like, which contrasts with the slightly more natural, albeit blurred, background.
- The purple flowers on the branch have a somewhat artificial appearance, with some areas looking slightly blurred or painted.
- There's a lack of fine detail and natural imperfections in the birds' eyes and beaks, contributing to an overall 'plastic' or rendered look.
- The background is heavily blurred, which could be a photographic technique, but combined with the other elements, it enhances the artificial feel of the foreground subjects.
Recommendation
Classify as AI-generated or heavily composited. The 'too perfect' aesthetic, uniform textures, and stylized composition are strong indicators of non-photographic origin or significant manipulation.
Content hash (SHA-256)
2fd161a714b1eb62fdb7e7e4d35b54ad4c99555c521957337394f0d1ac5d8167
This is a deepfake (30/100 authenticity). AI-generated or AI-altered.
This is an independent check — not legal proof, but a useful second opinion. Anyone can re-run it: same file in,
same answer out.
·